Publication:
Instituciones, innovación y transferencia de conocimiento: contribuciones de los estudios sobre las variedades del capitalismo

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorCentro de Estudios Sociales. Universidad de Coimbra
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Hugo
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-17T03:40:20Z
dc.date.available2016-05-17T03:40:20Z
dc.date.created2012-01
dc.date.embargoEndinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31es_CO
dc.descriptionEste trabajo realiza una interpretación de las teorías sobre las variedades del capitalismo resaltando sus implicaciones para la innovación, en especial para los procesos de transferencia de conocimiento entre la universidad y la empresa. Los estudios de las variedades del capitalismo señalan la importancia de la arquitectura institucional para la competitividad de los países. El debate pone de relieve las complementariedades institucionales como concepto útil en términos teóricos para explicar los procesos de desarrollo, así como necesidad de anclar el análisis institucional en datos empíricos. Estos enfoques son un complemento teórico importante para enmarcar los estudios sobre innovación, donde los procesos de transferencia de conocimiento se consideren uno de los aspectos esenciales del impulso de las innovaciones. El artículo realiza una revisión crítica de tres enfoques sobre variedades de capitalismo: el estudio precursor de Hall y Soskice, el de los sistemas empresariales de Whitley y el enfoque de la gobernanza de Amable y Boyer. Para cada uno de ellos se extraen corolarios que permiten conectarlos con los procesos de transferencia de conocimiento. El resultado señala que el foco central de atención a la empresa debe complementarse con un enfoque sistémico que permite ver la amplia gama de actores, donde la universidad se convierte en uno de los más relevantes. La intervención del gobierno es esencial en la configuración de un comportamiento innovador de los actores, para fomentar y promover el uso de diferentes mecanismos de transferencia de conocimiento."es_CO
dc.description.abstract"This article is an interpretation of the theories about the varieties of capitalism, highlighting their implications for innovation, especially for the processes of knowledge transfer between universities and businesses. Studies of the varieties of capitalism point to the importance of the institutional architecture for the competitiveness of countries. The debate highlights the institutional complementarities as a useful concept in theoretical terms to explain the processes of development and need to anchor institutional analysis on empirical data. These approaches are relevant to frame important theoretical studies on innovation, where knowledge transfer processes are considered one of the essential impetus for innovation. The article provides a critical review of three approaches to varieties of capitalism: the pioneering study of Hall and Soskice, the business systems of Whitley and the approach to governance of Amable and Boyer. Corollaries that can connect to processes of knowledge transfer are extracted for each approach. The conclusions indicate that the focus of attention to the company should be complemented with a systemic approach, to show the wide range of actors, where the university becomes one of the most important. Government intervention is essential in shaping an innovative behaviour of the actors, to encourage and promote the use of different mechanisms of knowledge transfer."es_CO
dc.description.sponsorshipARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Culturaes_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/511
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisher.editorARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura Vol. 188 - 753 enero-febrero (2012) 31-47 ISSN: 0210-1963 doi: 10.3989/arbor.2012.753n1003es_CO
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAkkermans, D. et al. (2009), “Do ‘liberal economies’ really innovate more radically than ‘coordinated market economies’? Hall and Soskice reconsidered”, Research Policy, 38, Elsevier, 181-191.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmable, B. (2005), Les cinq capitalismes: Diversité des systèmes économiques et sociaux dans la mondialisation, Paris: Seuil.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmable, B. et al. (1997), Les Systèmes d’Innovation à l’Ére de la Globalisation, Paris: Economica.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmable, B. y Lung, Y. (2008), The European Socio-Economic Models of a Knowledge-based Society. Main Findings and Conclusion, Cahiers du GREThA 2008- 26, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmable, B. y Petit, P. (1999), “Identifying the structure of institutions to promote innovation and growth”, CEPREMAP Working Papers, 9919, disponible online en http://www.cepremap.cnrs. fr/couv_orange/co9919.pdf a 26-11- 2009.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAoki, M. (2001), Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge y Londres: The MIT Press, 1-29es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBercovitz, J. y Feldman, M. (2005), “Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, 31, 175-188.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBerman, E. P. (2008), “Why Did Universities Start Patenting? Institution-Building and the Road to the Bayh-Dole Act”, Social Studies of Science, 38es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBok, D. (2003), Universities in the Marketplace - The Commercialization of Higher Education, New Jersey: Princeton University Presses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoyer, R. (2004), Une théorie du capitalisme est-elle possible?, Paris: Odile Jacob.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoyer, R. (2003), “Les institutions dans la théorie de la régulation“, CEPREMAP Working Papers, n. 2003-08, disponible online em www.cepremap.cnrs. fr/couv_orange/co0308.pdf a 26-11- 2009.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBozeman, B. (2000), “Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory”, Research Policy, 29, Elsevier, 627-655.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarrincazeaux, C. y Gaschet, F. (2006), “Knowledge and the Diversity of Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis of European Regions”, Cahiers du GRES, 29, Université MontesquieuBordeaux IVes_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCasper, S. (2006), “Export the Silicon Valley to Europe: How Useful is Comparative Institutional Theory?”, en Hager, J. y M. Meeus (eds.), Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change, New York: Oxford University Press, 483-504.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCasper, S. et al. (1999), “Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany: institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries”, Industry and Innovation, Routledge, 6, 6-23.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCooke, P. (1998), “Origins of the concept”, en Braczyc, H. J. et al. (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems - The role of governances in a globalized world, 1.ª ed., Londres: UCL Presses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDebackere, K. y Veugelers, R. (2005), “The role of academic transfer organizations in improving industry science links”, Research Policy, 34, Elsevier, 321-342.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEuropean Commission (1995), Livro Verde sobre a Inovação, Bruxelas: CE.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFreeman, C. y Louçã, F. (2004), Ciclos e Crises no Capitalismo Global - Das Revoluções Industriais à Revolução da Informação, Porto: Edições Afrontamento.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHollingsworth, J. R. y Boyer, R. (1997), “Coordination of Economic Actors and Social Systems of Production”, en J. Rogers Hollingsworth y Robert Boyer (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, Nueva York y Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJackson, G. y Deeg, R. (2006), “How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of capitalist Diversity”, MPIG Discussion Paper, 06/2.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLatour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social, Oxford: Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMolas-Gallart, J. et al. (2002), Measuring Third Stream Activities: Final Report to the Russell Group of Universities, Brighton: Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNorth, D. (1994), “Economics Performance Through Time”, The American Economic Review, 8, 3, 359-368es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOECD (2005), Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3.ª ed., Paris: OECD Publications.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPhan, P. H. y Siegel, D. S. (2006), “The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the U.S. and U.K”, Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics, 06/09, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economicses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSolari, S. y Gambarotto, F. (2009), Regional Dispersion of Economic Activities and Models of Capitalism in Europe, Artigo de Apoio à Conferência no Programa de Doutoramento em Governação, Conhecimento e Inovação, Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, Fevereiro.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTaylor, M. Z. (2004), “Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism’s Theory of Technological Innovation”, International Organization, 58, 601- 631es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWhitley, R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWhitley, R. (2003), “Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: The impact of institutional frameworks on the organisation of academic science”, Research Policy, 32, Elsevier, 1015-1029.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWhitley, R. (2007a), Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities - The Institutional Structuring of Competitive Competencies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWhitley, R. (2007b), Constructing universities as trategic actors: Limitations and varieties, Comunicación presentada en el Simposio “The Univesrity in the market”, Estocolmo, 1-3 de noviembre.es_CO
dc.subjectTransferencia de conocimientoes_CO
dc.subjectSistemas de innovaciónes_CO
dc.subjectCapitalismoes_CO
dc.subjectEmpresases_CO
dc.subjectUniversidadeses_CO
dc.subject.otherKnowledge transferes_CO
dc.subject.otherInnovation systemes_CO
dc.subject.otherCapitalismes_CO
dc.subject.otherBusiness enterpriseses_CO
dc.subject.otherUniversities and collegeses_CO
dc.titleInstituciones, innovación y transferencia de conocimiento: contribuciones de los estudios sobre las variedades del capitalismoes_CO
dc.title.alternativeInstitutions, innovation and knowledge transfer: contributions from the perpectives on the varieties of capitalismes_CO
dc.typeArtículo de revistaes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_CO
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1089-PINTO_2012_INSTITUCIONES_IN.PDF
Size:
205.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación