Publication:
The internationalization of science and its influence on academic entrepreneurship

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKrabel, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Donald S.
dc.contributor.authorSlavtchev, Viktor
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-25T19:05:53Z
dc.date.available2016-04-25T19:05:53Z
dc.date.created2009-01-28
dc.date.embargoEndinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31es_CO
dc.descriptionWe conjecture that the mobility of academic scientists increases the propensity of such agents to engage in academic entrepreneurship. Our empirical analysis is based on a survey of researchers at the Max Planck Society in Germany. We find that mobile scientists are more likely to become nascent entrepreneurs. Thus, it appears that citizenship and foreign-education are important determinants of the early stages of academic entrepreneurship.es_CO
dc.description.sponsorshipJerusalem Institute for Market Studieses_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/211
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.publisher.editorJerusalem Institute for Market Studieses_CO
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAckers L. 2005a. Moving People and Knowledge: Scientific Mobility in the European Union. International Migration 43(5): 99–131.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAckers L. 2005b. Promoting Scientific Mobility and Balanced Growth in the European Research Area. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 18(3): 301-317.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAgarwal R, Echambadi R, Sarkar AM. 2004. Knowledge Transfer through Inheritance: Spin-out Generation, Development and Survival. Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 501- 522.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAghion P, Blundell RW, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S. 2004. Entry and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Micro-Level Panel Data. Journal of the European Economic Association 2(2/3): 265-276.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAllen SD, Link AN, Rosenbaum DT. 2007. Entrepreneurship and Human Capital: Evidence of Patenting Activity from the Academic Sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 31(6): 937-951.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlmus M, Nerlinger EA. 1999. Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter? Small Business Economics 13(2): 141–154es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlvarez SA, Busenitz LW. 2001. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management 27(6): 755–775.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmit R, Glosten L, Muller E. 1993. Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies 30(5): 815-834.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAudretsch DB, Keilbach M. 2004. Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(5): 605-616es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArdichvili A, Cardozo R, and Ray S. 2003. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing 18():105–123.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAvveduto S. 2001. International mobility of PhDs. In: OECD (ed). Innovative People: Mobility of Skilled Personnel in National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaldwin J, Gorecki P. 1991. Entry, exit and productivity growth, in: Geroski P, Schwalbach J. (eds). Entry and market contestability: An international comparison. Blackwell, Oxford.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD. 1988. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, revised edition, San Diego: Harcourt Brace.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaumol WJ. 2004. Entrepreneurial Enterprises, Large Established Firms and Other Components of the Free-Market Growth Machine. Small Business Economics 23(1), 9-21.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBuenstorf, G. 2008. Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy, forthcominges_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBusenitz, L.W., Gomez, C., and Spencer, J. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 994-1003.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCefis E, Marsili O. 2005. A matter of life and death: innovation and firm survival. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(6): 1167–1192es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollins J. 2003. Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: policy responses to immigrant entrepreneurs in Australia. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 15(2): 137–149.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationColombo MG, Grilli L. 2005. Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy 34(): 795–816.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCooper AC, Bruno AV. 1977. Success Among High-Technology Firms. Business Horizons 20(2): 16-22es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCooper AC. 1986. Entrepreneurship and high technology. In: Sexton DL, Smilor, RW. (eds). The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 153-186.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDi Gregorio D, Shane S. 2003. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy 32(2): 209–227.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDoms M, Dunne T, Roberts MJ. 1995. The role of technology use in the survival and growth of manufacturing plants. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 13(): 523-542.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDosi G, Llerena P, Labini MS. 2006. Science-technology-Industry Links and the 'European Paradox': Some Notes on the Dynamics of Scientific and Technological Research in Europe, in: Lorenz E, Lundvall BA. (eds). How Europe's Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models, pp. 203-234, Oxford: Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFeeser HR. 1987. Incubators, entrepreneurs, strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFeeser HR, Willard GE. 1990. Founding Strategy and Performance: A Comparison of High and Low Growth High Tech Firms. Strategic Management Journal 11(2): 87- 98.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGaillard J, Gaillard A. 1997. The International Mobility of Brains: Exodus or Circulation? Science, Technology and Society 2(2): 195–228.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGeroski PA. 1995. What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(): 421-440.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGranovetter MS. 1978. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(): 1360–1380.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGranovetter MS. 1985. Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGreve A, Salaff JW. 2003. Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28(1): 1-22.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHall BH, Oriani R. 2006. Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24(): 971– 993.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHayton, J.C., George, G., & Zahra, S.A. 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 33– 52.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIreland RD, Tihanyi L, Webb JW. 2008. A Tale of Two Politico-Economic Systems: Implications for Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32(1): 107–130.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKeh HT, Foo MD, Lim BC. (). Opportunity Evaluation under Risky Conditions: The Cognitive Processes of Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 27(2): 125-148.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKirzner IM. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKirzner IM. 1979. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKirzner IM. 1997. Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35(): 60-85es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLaudel G. 2005. Migration currents among the scientific elite. Minerva 43(): 377– 395.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLevie J. 2007. Immigration, In-migration, Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship in the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 28(2): 143–169.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLicht AN. 2007. The entrepreneurial spirit and what the law can do about it. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 28(4): 817-862es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLight I. 1979. Disadvantaged Minorities in Self-Employment. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 28(): 31–45.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLowe RA, Gonzalez-Brambila C. 2007. Faculty Entrepreneurs and Research Productivity. Journal of Technology Transfer 32(3): 173–194.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMahroum S. 1999a. Patterns of academic inflows to UK Higher Education system. Higher Education in Europe, The Entrepreneurial University: How to Survive and Prosper in an Era of Global Competition, XXIV, 1.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMahroum S. 1999b. Global magnets: science and technology disciplines and departments in the United Kingdom. Minerva 37(4): 379-390.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMahroum S. 2000. Scientists and global spaces. Technology in Society 22(): 513–523.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarcati A, Guido G, Peluso A. 2008. The role of SME entrepreneurs’ innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations. Research Policy 37(9): 1579-1590.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMartin-Rovet D, Carlson T. 1995. The international exchange of scholars: The training of young scientists through research abroad II. American scientists in France. Minerva 33(): 171-191.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMartin-Rovet D. 1995. The international exchange of scholars: The training of young scientists through research abroad I. Young French scientists in the United States. Minerva 33(): 75-98.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcMillan G, Deeds L. 1998 The role of reputation in the recruitment of scientists. R&D Management 28(4): 299-304(6)es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMeyer M. 2003. Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Researchbased ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management 33(2): 107-115.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMillard D. 2005. The impact of clustering on scientific mobility. A case study of the UK. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 18(3): 343-359.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMitchell RK, Busenitz L, Lant T, McDougall PP, Morse EA, Smith JB. 2002. Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 27(2): 93-104.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMorano-Foadi S. 2005. Scientific Mobility, Career Progression, and Excellence in the European Research Area. International Migration 43(5): 133-162.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMueller SL, Thomas AS. 2000. Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing 16(): 51–75es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationO’Shea R, Allen T, Chevalier A, Roche F. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy 34(7): 994-1009.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPhan, P, and Siegel, D.S. 2006. The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(2): 77-144.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPortes A, Haller WJ, Guarzoni LE. 2002. Transnational Entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaption. American Sociological Review 67(): 278-298.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReynolds PD, Bygrave WD, Autio E. 2004a. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2003 Executive Report. Kansas City: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReynolds PD, Carter NM, Gartner WB, Greene PG. 2004b. The Prevalence of Nascent Entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics, Small Business Economics 23(4): 263-284.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaxenian AL. 1999. Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. Public Policy Institute of California, CAes_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchumpeter JA. 1911. Die Theorie wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin; English edition: The Theory of Economic Development (1934). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchumpeter JA. 1911. Die Theorie wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin; English edition: The Theory of Economic Development (1934). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchumpeter JA. 1947. The creative responce in economic history, Journal of Economic History 7(): 149-159.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShane S. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShane S, Stuart S. 2002. Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups. Management Science 48(1): 154-170.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShane S, Venkatamaran S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25(1): 217-22G.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShane S, Venkatamaran S. 2003. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32(2): 181-.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSingh RP, Hills GE, Hybels C, Lumpkin GT. 1999. Opportunity Recognition through Social Network Characteristics of Entrepreneurs, in Reynolds PD, Bygrave WD, Manigart S, Mason CM, Meyer GD, Sapienza HJ, Shaver KG. (eds). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, pp. 228–256.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationStuart TE, Ding WW. 2006. When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 112(1): 97-144.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationToole, A.A. and Czarnitzki, D. 2007. Biomedical Academic Entrepreneurship Through the SBIR Program, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63, 716-738.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVan Reenen J. 1997. Employment and Technological Innovation: Evidence from UK Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Labor Economics 15(2): 255-284.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVenkataraman S. 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In: Katz J, Brockhaus R. (eds). Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth, vol. 3, pp. 119-138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWilliams AM, Baláž V, Wallace C. 2004. International Labour Mobility and Uneven Regional Development in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies. 11(1): 27- 46.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWong PK, Ho YP, Autio E. 2005. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics 24: 335–350.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWright M, Clarisse B, Mustar P, Lockett A. 2007. Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe. Edward Elgar: Cheltenhamm, UK and Nortzhampton, MA, USA.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZhao H, Seibert SE. 2006. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(2): 259-271.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZucker LG, Darby MR. 2007. Star Scientists, Innovation and Regional and National Immigration. NBER Working Paper 13547es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS. 2002. Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology. Management Science 48(1): 138–153.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB. 1998. Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review 88(), 290-306.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZucker, Lynne G. & Darby, Michael R. & Furner, Jonathan & Liu, Robert C. & Ma, Hongyan, 2007. Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy, 36(6): 850-863.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarlson T, Martin-Rovet D. 1995. The Implications of Scientific Mobility between France and the United-States. Minerva 33(3): 211-250es_CO
dc.subjectCientíficos -- Movilidad laborales_CO
dc.subjectCapital humanoes_CO
dc.subjectTransferencia de conocimientoes_CO
dc.subjectInmigrantes -- Capacidad empresariales_CO
dc.subject.otherAcademic Entrepreneurshipes_CO
dc.subject.otherHuman Capitales_CO
dc.subject.otherScientific Mobilityes_CO
dc.subject.otherKnowledge Transferes_CO
dc.subject.otherImmigrant Entrepreneurshipes_CO
dc.titleThe internationalization of science and its influence on academic entrepreneurshipes_CO
dc.title.alternativeJIMS Discussion Paper Series DP 280109es_CO
dc.typeLibroes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookes_CO
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1513-Internationalization and entrepreneurship.pdf
Size:
125.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Internationalization and entrepreneurship
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación