Publication:
Desarrollo de una metodología de evaluación de capacidades de innovación

dc.contributor.authorRobledo Velásquez, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorLopez G., Cristina
dc.contributor.authorZapata Londoño, Willmar
dc.contributor.authorPerez V., Juan David
dc.creatror.idjrobledov@unal.edu.coes_CO
dc.creatror.idindustrial@usbmed.edu.coes_CO
dc.creatror.idwillmar.zapata@ieb.com.coes_CO
dc.creatror.idjuan.perez@ cidet.org.coes_CO
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-17T03:43:14Z
dc.date.available2016-05-17T03:43:14Z
dc.date.created2010-06-30
dc.date.embargoEndinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31es_CO
dc.description"Desde la Perspectiva Basada en los Recursos, la competitividad de las empresas depende críticamente de activos acumulados por la organización; en particular, la atención de los analistas se centra con frecuencia en las denominadas “capacidades de innovación”. En esta dirección, una preocupación central de teóricos y practicantes de la gestión tecnológica es identificar el tipo y el nivel de las capacidades necesarias para soportar sistemas exitosos de Gestión de I+D+i (Investigación, Desarrollo Experimental e Innovación). El presente trabajo busca contribuir a este propósito mediante el desarrollo de una metodología de evaluación de capacidades: presenta una metodología de evaluación que integra tres componentes: un modelo conceptual basado en una aproximación sistémica a la organización que toma la propuesta conceptual de Nadler y Thusman y elabora una caracterización de capacidades, una métrica elaborada a partir del Modelo de Madurez de Capacidades (CMM) y un instrumento de implementación basado en entrevistas semi-estructuradas."es_CO
dc.description.abstractFrom a Resource-Based Perspective, company competitiveness critically depends on assets accumulated by the organization. The focus of analysts often concentrates on the so-called “innovation capacities.” Along these lines, a main concern of theorists and practitioners of technology management, is identifying the type and level of capacity needed to support successful management systems RDI (Research, Experimental Development and Innovation). The present work aims at contributing to this issue by developing a capacity assessment methodology. It presents an evaluation methodology that integrates three components: a conceptual model based on a systemic approach to companies that borrows the conceptual proposal of Nadler and Thusman, and develops a characterization of capacities; a metric developed based on the Capability Maturity Model (CMM); and an implementation instrument based on semi-structured interviews."es_CO
dc.description.sponsorshipPerfil de Coyuntura Económicaes_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/525
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisher.editorPerfil de Coyuntura Económica No. 15, agosto 2010, pp. 133-148 © Universidad de Antioquiaes_CO
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAdler, P.; GoldoftAs, B. y Levine, D. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota productions system, Organization Science, 10, pp. 43-68.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBAden- fuller, C. y volBerdA, H.W. (1997). “Strategic renewal: How large complex organizations prepare for the future”. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27, pp. 95-120es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBArney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99-120.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCAlAntone, R.J.; CAvusGil, S.T. y ZhAo (2002). “Industrial Marketing Management Learning Orientation”. Firm innovation capability, and firm performance, 31, pp. 515-524.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGAluniC, D.C. y eisenhArdt, K.M. (2001). “Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms”, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 1229-1249.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGrAnt, R. (1991). “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation”. California Management Review, Spring, pp. 114-135.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationillGen, J y Gledhill, D. (2001). “21st Century Verification and Validation Techniques for Synthetic Training Models and Simulations”. Illgen Simulation Technologies, Inc, [en línea], disponible en: http://www.mors.org/meetings/test_eval/presentations/Plenary_Illgen.Gledhill.pdfes_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJeston, J. y nelis, J. (2006). Business Process Management: Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations, Butterworth-Heinemann-Elsevier, Oxford.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationllorens, F.J.; GArCíA, V.J. y verdu, A. (2004). “The influence on personal mastery, organizational learning and performance of the level of innovation: adaptive organization versus innovator organization”, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 1, pp. 101-115es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationnAdler, D. A. y tushmAn, M. L. (1997). The Power of Organization Arquitecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationrAnGone, A. (1999). “A resource-based approach to strategy analysis in small-medium sized enterpreises”, Small Business Economics, 12, pp. 233-248.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationrenArd, L. y sAint-AmAnt, G. (2003). Capacité, capacité organisationnelle et capacité dynamique: une proposition de définitions. Les cahiers du Management Technologique, pp. 43-56es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationroBledo, J.; GómeZ, F.A. y restrepo, J.F. (2008). “Relación entre Capacidades de Innovación Tecnológica y Desempeño Empresarial en Colombia”. Memorias del Primer Congreso Internacional de Gestión Tecnológica e Innovación, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, agosto 14 y 15, p. 21.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationsher, P. J. y yAnG, P. Y. (2005). “The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry”. Technovation, 25, pp. 33-43es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationteeCe, D.J.; pisAno, G. & shuen, A. (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”. Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 509-533.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationuniversidAd de miChiGAn. (2005). Open Systems Paradigm. Michigan Engineering, IOE 421, September 14.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWAnG, C.; LU, I. y Chen, C. (2007). “Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty”, Technovation, doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007, article in presses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationyAm, R. C. M.; GuAn, J. C.; pun, K. F. y tAnG, E. P. Y. (2004). “An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China.” Research Policy, 33, pp. 1123–1140.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZAhrA, S. A. y nielsen, A.P. (2002). “Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization”. Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 377-398.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZott, C. (2003). “Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study”. Strategic Management Journal, 24, pp. 97-125es_CO
dc.subjectCapacidad empresariales_CO
dc.subjectGestión empresariales_CO
dc.subjectSistema de gestión tecnológicaes_CO
dc.subjectModelos organizacionaleses_CO
dc.subjectPerspectiva Basada en Recursoses_CO
dc.subject.otherEntrepreneurshipes_CO
dc.subject.otherIndustrial managementes_CO
dc.subject.otherInnovation capacitieses_CO
dc.subject.otherEvaluation methodologyes_CO
dc.subject.otherOrganizational modelses_CO
dc.subject.otherResource-Based Perspectivees_CO
dc.titleDesarrollo de una metodología de evaluación de capacidades de innovaciónes_CO
dc.typeArtículo de revistaes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_CO
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1095-ROBLEDOV_2010_DESARROLLO_DE.PDF
Size:
797.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: