Publication:
Industrial policy, innovation capability accumulation and discontinuities

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Paulo N De
dc.creatror.idpnf@fgv.bres_CO
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-26T05:10:09Z
dc.date.available2016-04-26T05:10:09Z
dc.date.created2009-06-17
dc.date.embargoEndinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31es_CO
dc.description"This paper examines a “path-creating” innovation capability accumulation trajectory in latecomer natural resource-processing industries across discontinuous policy regimes. Drawing on multiple-case and first-hand evidence from 13 forestry, pulp and paper firms in Brazil (1950- 2007) it was found that: (1) Firms’ innovation capability accumulation paths involved a qualitative departure from the established technological trajectory at the early stage of their capability development; (2) As firms moved along the new technological segment, over discontinuous policy regimes, there was a high degree of variability across and within firms in terms of “depths” and speeds of capability accumulation; (3) Firms that reached advanced and world-leading capability levels exhibited a combination between pro-active innovation strategies, entrepreneurial management and synergetic, and relatively informal, relationships with industrial policy-making, other than protectionism; (4) Such combination proved essential for such innovators to thrive along the new technological segment and cross discontinuous industrial policy regimes with progressively higher innovative performance. By adopting an approach that captures types, stages and dynamics of firms’ innovation capability building, the paper contributes to expanding our understanding of technological “catch-up”. It also sheds light on the role of firms’ innovation strategies and government policy in achieving international leadership in natural resource-processing industries from latecomer natural resource-endowed contexts."es_CO
dc.description.sponsorshipPaper to be presented at the Summer Conference 2009es_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/255
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAriffin, N.; Bell, M. 1999. “Firms, politics and political economy: patterns of subsidiary-parent linkages and technological capability-building in electronics TNC subsidiaries in Malaysia”. In: Jomo, k., S. Rasiah, R., Felker, G. (Eds). Industrial Technology Development in Malaysia, London: Routledge.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAriffin, N. 2000. The internationalisation of innovative capabilities: the Malaysian electronics industry.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brighton: SPRU/University of Sussex.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmsden, A. and Chu, W. 2003. Beyond Late Development, MIT Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmsden, A. H. and F. T. Tschang 2003. “A new approach to assessing the technological complexity of different categories of R&D (with examples from Singapore)”, Research Policy, 32: 553-572.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAriffin, N. and Figueiredo, P. 2004. “Internationalisation of innovative capabilities: counterevidence from the electronics industry in Malaysia and Brazil”, Oxford Development Studies, 32 (4): 559-583.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBRACELPA 2008. Relatório Estatístico Anual. Available in http://www.bracelpa.org.br/bra/estatisticas/index.htmles_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBell, M. 1993. Integrating R&D with industrial production and technical change: strengthening linkages and changing structures. Workshop on Integration of S&T in Development Planning and Management Process, 27-30 September, Amman, Jordan.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBell, M., D. Scott-Kemmis, & W. Satyarakwit 1982. “Limited learning in infant industry: a case study”, In: F. Stewart and F. James (eds.). The Economics of New Technology in Developing Countries, London: Frances Pinter, pp. 138-156.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBell, M. and Pavitt, K. 1993. “Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2 (2): 157-211.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBell, M. and M. van Dijk 2003. Imbalanced assimilation and accumulation: technological development of the Indonesian pulp and paper industry (1923-2002). Workshop Innovation and Learning in a Gobalised World, Experiences of Developing Countries, Eindhoven.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBell, M. 2006. “Time and technological learning in industrialising countries: how long does it take? How fast is it moving (if at all)?”, International Journal of Technology Management, 36 (1-3): 25-42.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBell, M. and Figueiredo, P. N. 2008. “Building innovation Capabilities in Latecomer Firms: Recent Conceptual and Empirical Contributions”. In: Richard, N., Cantwell, J. and Amman, E. (Eds.). Innovating Firms in Emerging Economies. [work-in-progress]es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCampinhos, E. 1999. “Sustainable plantations of high yield Eucalyptus trees for production of fiber: the Aracruz case”, New Forests, 17: 129-43.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCampinhos, E., Iannelli-Servin, C., Cardoso, N., Almeida, M. and Rosa, A. (2000), “Hidrojardim clonal Champion: uma otimização na produção de mudas de eucalipto. Silvicultura, 80: 42- 46.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChoi, N., Kang, D.Y., 2000. ”A study on the crisis, recovery, and industrial upgrading in the republic of korea”. In: Asian Corporate Recovery: Findings from Firm-level Surveys in Five Countries’, World Bank, Washington, DC., Chapter 11.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChoung, J., Hwang, H., Choi. J. 2000. “Transition of Latecomer Firms from Technology Users to Technology Generators, Korean Semiconductor Firms”, World Development, 28 (5): 969-982es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChoung, J-Y, H-R Hwang, H. Yang 2006. “The co-evolution of technology and institution in the Korean information and communications industry”. International Journal of Technology Management, 36 (1-3): 249-266.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCimoli, M. & J. Katz 2003. “Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: a Latin American perspective”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (2): 387-411.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal 1990. “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–52.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDahlman, C., Ross-Larson, B. & Westphal, L. E. 1987. “Managing technological development: lessons from the newly industrializing countries”, World Development, 15 (6): 759–75.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDalcomuni, S.M. 1997. Dynamic capabilities for cleaner production innovation: the case of the market pulp export industry in Brazil. Unpublished D.Phil. Thesis, SPRU University of Sussex, Brighton.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDantas, E. and Bell, M. 2006. “The Development of Firm-centred Knowledge Netwoks in Emerging Economies: the Case of Petrobras in the Offshore Oil Innovation System in Brazil”, paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen, June 18-20.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Assis, T. F. 2001. “Evolution of Technology for cloning Eucalyptus in large scale”. In: Proceedings of IUFRO International Symposium on Developing the Eucalypt of the Future. Valdivia, Chile, 10-15 September, Invited Paper, pp.1-16.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDougherty, D. 2002. “Grounded theory research methods”, In: J. A. C. Baum (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Organisations, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.849-867.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDutrénit, G. 2000. Learning and Knowledge Management in the Firm: From Knowledge Accumulation to Strategic Capabilities, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) 2008. Structural Change and Productivity Growth – 20 Years Later. Old Problems, new opportunities. 32nd Session of ECLAC, San Domingo, Dominican Republic, 9-13 June.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEisenhardt, K. M. 1989, “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. 2007. “Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges”, Academy of Management Journal, 50: 25-32.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEvans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEvans, J. and Turnbull, J. W. 2004. Plantation Forestry in the Tropics. The Role of Silviculture, and Use of Planted Forests for Industrial, Social, Environmental, and Agroforestry Purposes. 3rd edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFeng, L. And Ling, M. 2007. Learning by innovating: Lessons from the development of the Chinese digital video player industry. Mimeo.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFigueiredo, P. N. 2003. “Learning, capability accumulation and firms differences: evidence from latecomer steel”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (3): 607-643.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGrattapaglia, D. 2004. “Integrating genomics into Eucalyptus breeding”, Genetic and Molecular Research, 30, 3 (3): 369-379.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHobday, M. 1995. Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, UK.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHobday, M., H. Rush, and J. Bessant 2004. “Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership”, Research Policy, 33: 1433-57.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIkemori, Y.K. 1990. Genetic variation in characteristics of Eucalyptus grandis raised from micro-propagation and seed, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Oxford, Oxford University.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIammarino, S. Padilla R., von Tunzelmann N. 2008. “Technological capabilities and global-local interactions. The electronics industry in two Mexican regions”, World Development, 36 (10): 1980-2010es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJonker, M., Romijn, H., Szirmin, A. 2006. “Technological effort, technological capabilities and economic performance. A case study of the paper manufacturing sector in West Java”, Technovation, 26, pp. 121-34es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKatz, J. (ed.) 1987. Technology Generation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries, Macmillan, London.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim, L., 1980. “Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: a model”, Research Policy, 9: 254-277es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim, L. 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, MA: Harvard Business School Press, Boston.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim, L. 1998. “Crisis construction and organisational learning: capability building in catchingup at Hyundai Motor”, Organization Science, 9: 506-21es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLaestadius, S. 1998. “The relevance of science and technology indicators: the case of pulp and paper”, Research Policy, 27: 385-95es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLall, S. 1987. Learning to Industrialise: The Acquisition of Technological Capability by India, Macmillan, London.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLall, S. 1992. “Technological Capabilities and Industrialisation”, World Development, 20 (2): 165-86.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLall, S. 2003. Reinventing industrial strategy: the role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. Trade and Industrial Policy Strategy (TIPS) Working Paper 9- 2004.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLee, K. 2005. Making a Technological Catch-up: Barriers and Opportunities, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13, 2, pp. 97-131es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLee, K., Lim, C. and Song, W. 2005. “Digital Technology as a Window of Opportunity and Technological Leapfrogging: Catch-up in Digital TV by the Korean Firms”, International Journal of Technology Management, 29 (1/2): 40-64.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarcelle, G. 2004. Technological Learning: A Strategic Imperative for Firms in the Developing World, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMathews, J.A., and Cho, D.S. 1989. “Creating a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia”, Strategic Management Journal, 10: 17-32es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMiles, M.M. and Huberman, A. M. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, CA: Sage, Newbury Park.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMowery, D. 1983. “The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940”, Explorations in Economic History, 20: 351-74.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMu, Q., Lee, Lee, K. 2005. “Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catchup: The case of the telecommunication industry in China”, Research Policy, 34: 759-783.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOcampo, J. A. 2001. Structural dynamics and economic development, Santiago: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, CEPAL/ECLAC, Mimeo.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPerez, C., Soete, L. 1988. Catching-up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg G., Soete, L. (eds).Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers: London.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPerez, C. 2008. A Vision for Latin America: A resource-based strategy for technological dynamism and social inclusion. Paper presented to the ECLAC Program Technology Policy and Development in Latin America. 5 July.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPoggiani, F. and Suiter Filho, W. 1974. “Importância da nebulização intermitente e efeito do tratamento hormonal na formação de raízes em estacas de eucalipto”, IPEF Piracicaba, 9: 119-29.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPPI (Pulp and paper international). 2007. Technical report.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPressman, J. L. and Wildavsky, A. 1984. Implementation (3rd ed.), Berkeley: University of California Press.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReinhardt, N. and Peres W. 2000. “Latin America’s New Economic Model: Micro Responses and Economic Restructuring”, World Development, 28 (9): 1543-1563.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRodrik, D. 2004. Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP04-047, Harvard University: John F. Kennedy School of Government.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRodrik, D. 2006. Industrial Development: Stylized Facts and Policies. Harvard University: John F. Kennedy School of Government. Mimeo.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShadish, W., Cook, T., Campbell, D. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs, Houghton Mifflin company, Boston, New York.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScott-Kemmis, D. 1988. “Learning and the Accumulation of Technological Capacity in Brazilian Pulp and Paper Firms”, Working Paper, World Employment Programme Research, 187: (2- 22)es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTsekouras, G. 2006. “Gaining competitive advantage through knowledge integration in an European industrialising economy”, International Journal of Technology Management, 36 (1-3): 126-147.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationvan DijK, M. and Bell, M. 2007. “Rapid Growth with Limited Learning: Industrial Policy and Indonesia’s Pulp and Paper Industry”,Oxford Development Studies, 35 (2): 149-169.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationViotti, E., 2002. “National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in the late industrializing economies and evidence from the cases of Brazil and South Korea”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69 (7): 653–680.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWoo, C., Sul, K., 2000. Industrial Upgrading in Korea: Process and Prospect, Korea Development Institute (KDI), Korea, Seoul.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, London.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZheng, M and Williamson P.J. 2007. Dragons at your Door: How Chinese Cost Innovation is Disrupting the Rules of Global Competition. MA: Harvard Business School Press, Bostones_CO
dc.subjectPolítica industriales_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicases_CO
dc.subjectInvestigación científicaes_CO
dc.subject.otherIndustrial Policyes_CO
dc.subject.otherTechnological innovationses_CO
dc.subject.otherResearches_CO
dc.subject.otherTechnological catch-upes_CO
dc.subject.otherInnovation capabilityes_CO
dc.subject.otherLatecomer firmses_CO
dc.subject.otherNatural resourceses_CO
dc.subject.otherProcessing industrieses_CO
dc.subject.otherMultiple case-studyes_CO
dc.titleIndustrial policy, innovation capability accumulation and discontinuitieses_CO
dc.typeArtículo de revistaes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1631-INDUSTRIAL POLICY, INNOVATION CAPABILITY ACCUMULATION AND DISCONTINUITIES 1.pdf
Size:
542.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación