Publication:
National innovation policy and global open innovation: Exploring balances, tradeoffs and complementarities.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHerstad, Sverre J.
dc.contributor.authorBloch, Carter
dc.contributor.authorEbersberger, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorvan de Velde, Els
dc.creatror.idsverre.herstad@nifustep.noes_CO
dc.creatror.idsverre.herstad@nifustep.noes_CO
dc.creatror.idcarter.bloch@cfa.au.dkes_CO
dc.creatror.idbernd.ebersberger@mci.edues_CO
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-17T03:42:54Z
dc.date.available2016-05-17T03:42:54Z
dc.date.created2009-10
dc.date.embargoEndinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31es_CO
dc.description"In recent years, much attention has been devoted to the link between open innovation and globalization. As firms are driven to change due to intensifying innovation-based competition and increasing complexity of knowledge and products, innovation policy needs to evolve in order to reflect the new industrial landscape. The aim of this paper is to suggest a framework for examining the way national policy mixes are responding to the challenges and opportunities of globally distributed knowledge networks, cross-sectoral technology flows and consequently open innovation processes occurring on an international scale. We argue that the purpose of public research and innovation policy remains one of developing and sustaining territorial knowledge bases capable of growing and supporting internationally competitive industries. But the rules of the game have changed. Public policy now needs to carefully balance between a) promoting the formation of international linkages for knowledge sourcing and information exposure; b) providing incentives for domestic industry intramural R&D for the purpose of building absorptive capacity and knowledge accumulation; c) sustaining domestic networking to allow accumulated knowledge to diffuse and recombine..."es_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/523
dc.language.isoenges_CO
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmin, Ash and Nigel Thrift. 2002. Cities: Re-imagining the urban. Cambridge University Presses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArrow, Kenneth. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of the resources for invention. In R.R. Nelson, ed., The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 609-627es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAsheim, Björn and Arne Isaksen. 2002. Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoschma, R, R Eriksson and U Lindgren. 2009. How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, pp. 169–190.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoyer, Robert. 2004. New Growth regimes but still institutional diversity. Socio-Economic Review, (2), pp.1-32, Oxford University Presses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChesbrough Henry. 2003. Open Innovation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCoe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 271-295.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCohen, Wesley M, D.A Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCooke, Philip. 2007. To Construct Regional Advantage from Innovation Systems First Build policy Platforms. European Planning Studies, 15(2), 179 – 194es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCotic-Svetina, A; Jaklic, M; Prodan, I. 2008. Does collective learning in clusters contribute to innovation? Science and Public Policy 35 (5), pp. 335-345es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFey, Carl F and J Birkinshaw. 2005. External sources of knowledge, governance mode and R&D performance. Journal of Management 31(4), 597-621.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFrenken, K, F.G van Oort and T Verburg. 2007. Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5), pp. 685-697es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGertler, Meric and Y Levitte. 2005. Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation. Industry and Innovation, 13es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGoerzen, Anthony and Paul W Beamish. 2003. Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1289-1306.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGörg, Holger and David Greenway. 2004. Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? The World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171-197.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHagedoorn, John. 1993. Understanding the rationale for strategic technology partnering: Inter-organizational modes of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 109-122es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHauknes, Johan and Mark Knell. 2009. Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages: An input-output approach to the interaction of high- and low-tech industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 459-469es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHerstad, S, C Bloch, B Ebersberger and E van de Velde. 2008. Open innovation and globalisation: Theory, evidence and policy implications, Vision EraNet project report http://www.visioneranet.org/index.phtml?s=65&v_197=742.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJensen, Michael. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, July 1993, 831-880es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKallerud, Erik and Johan Hauknes. 2007. European Trend Chart on Innovation – Country Report Norway 2006, Oslo, Norway.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKarlsen, J, A Isaksen and O.R Spilling. Forthcoming. The challenge of constructing regional advantage in peripheral areas: The case of marine biotechnology in Tromso, Norway. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKnell, Mark and Martin Srholec. 2008. Technological collaboration and foreign ownership across firms in Europe. Report, Innovation Watch-Systematic.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLam, Alice. 2003. Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK. Journal of Management Studies 40(3), 673-703es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLichtenthaler, Ulrich and Holger Ernst. 2007. External technology commercialisation in large firms. R&D management 37 (5),es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMeyer, M.B. (2008) The dynamics of science in a small country: The case of Luxembourg. Science and Public Policy, 35 (5), 361-371es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNooteboom, Bart. 2001. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4, 69-92es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPiore, Michael J and Charles F Sabel. 1984. The Second industrial divide. Basic Books, New York.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUNCTAD (2005) World investment report 2005: The Internationalisation of R&D. van Pottelsberge de la Potterie, Bruno and Frank Lichtenberg. 2001. Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? The review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 490-497.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZahra, Shaker A and Gerard George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.es_CO
dc.subjectCiencia, Tecnología e Innovaciónes_CO
dc.subjectPolítica Científica y Tecnológicaes_CO
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicases_CO
dc.subjectDesarrollo científico y tecnológicoes_CO
dc.subjectDesarrollo económicoes_CO
dc.subject.otherScience & Technologyes_CO
dc.subject.otherScience and statees_CO
dc.subject.otherTechnological innovationses_CO
dc.subject.otherEconomic developmentes_CO
dc.titleNational innovation policy and global open innovation: Exploring balances, tradeoffs and complementarities.es_CO
dc.typeArtículo de revistaes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1086-National innovation policy and global open innovation. 1.pdf
Size:
106.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación