Publication:
Recuento crítico de la literatura sobre los impactos de la investigación y sus indicadores

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZambrano, Jorge Andrés
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo Salazar, Hernán
dc.contributor.authorForero Pineda, Clemente
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-12T13:31:06Z
dc.date.available2016-04-12T13:31:06Z
dc.date.created2002
dc.date.embargoEndinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31es_CO
dc.descriptionEl presente capítulo se centra en el estudio de los impactos sociales de la investigación y en la medición de estos impactos. El estudio del impacto de la actividad investigativa admite distintas secciones: las múltiples definiciones de los sistemas de innovación y del impacto de dichos sistemas; la visión institucionalista de los sistemas de innovación; la evaluación de impactos de la investigación; el nuevo enfoque que se está dando al análisis de los impactos, centrado en la formación de redes; y el debate sobre el impacto de la investigación en ciencias básicas y la justificación para su financiación. En una sección final nos referimos a la literatura existente sobre las formas de medir los impactos de la investigación a través de indicadores.es_CO
dc.description.sponsorshipColombia. Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Colcienciases_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/87
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisher.editorCOLCIENCIASes_CO
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbramovitz, M.A, David P.A. “Convergence and deferred catch-up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism”. CEPR Publication No 401. Stanford University, Stanford, 1994.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollins, Harry. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallon, Michel. “Le réseau comme forme émergente et comme modalité de coordination: le cas des interactions stratégiques entre firmes industrielles et laboratoires académiques”. En Réseau et Coordination. Michel Callon, Cohendet, Curien, Dalle Eymard-Duvernay, Foray & Schenk. Paris: Economica, 1999. 13-64.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbramovitz, M.A. “Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind”. Journal of Economic History, no 46 (1986): 385-406.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAghion, P y Howitt, P. Endogeneus Growth Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MITes_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArora, A. y Gambardella, A. “The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research in Economics”. 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationASIF Team. Assessing the Socio-economics Impacts of the Framework Programme. Manchester: PREST, University of Manchester, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBanze, C. E. “A especificidade e a diversidade do continente africano: uma sugestão inicial de tipologias de sistemas nacionais de inovação”. Monografia de Graduação, Belo Horizonte, FACE-UFMG, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBeggs, J. “Long-Run Trends in Patenting”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 155-174.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBernard, Anne. “IDRC Networks: An Ethnographic Perspective”. International Development Research Centre, 1996.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBernardes, A. y Albuquerque, E. “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries”. Research Policy 32 (2003): 865-885.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBlair, Cameron. “Evaluating research and development performance”. Mem Desk Research, 1999.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBozeman, B. “Peer review and evaluation of R&D impacts”. En Evaluating R&D impacts: Methods and practice. B. Bozeman y J. Melkers, editores. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrown, Martin. “Cost/benefit analysis of large scale S&T projects: notes on some methodological issues”. Trabajo para Megascience: The OECD Forum, París, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCalvert, J., y Martin, B. “Changing conceptions of basic research”. Documento para el Workshop on Policy Relevance and Measurement of Basic Research, Oslo, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCapron, H., y Cincera M. “Assessing the institutional set up of national innovation systems”. Universidad Libre de Bruselas, Bruselas.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M. y Rickne, A. “Innovation systems. Analytical and methodological issues”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 233-245.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCassiman, B. Perez-Castrillo, D. y Veugelers, R. “Endogeneizing know-how flows trough the nature R&D investment”. Paper presented 1er World Congress of the Game Theory Society, Bilbao and the EARIC, Conference Lausanne, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCharnes, A., Cooper W. W. y Ferguson R. “Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming”. Management Science 1, (1955): 138-151.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCoriat, B., y Weinstein, O. “Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 273-290.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCozzens, S. E. “Assessment of Fundamental Science programs in the Context of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)”. Rand Domestic Research Division Report. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationa Motta e Albuquerque y Tristao Bernardes. “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: a tentative simplified model and initial notes about statistics from 120 countries”. Texto para discussion No. 157, Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais, Faculdade De Ciências Económicas, Centro De Desenvolvimento E Planejamento Regional, Belo Horizonte, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDixit, A. “Some Lessons from Transaction-Cost Politics for Less-Developed Countries”. Working paper, Princeton University, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEnglander, A.S, Evenson, R. y Hanazaki, M. “R&D, Innovation and the Total factor Productivity Slowdown”. OECD Econ. Stu. 11, (1988): 8-42.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEngle R. F. y Granger C. W. J. “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica 55, no. 2 (1987): 251-276.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEvenson, R. “International Invention: Implications for Technology Market Analysis”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 73-88.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFreeman, Chris. “Continental, national and sub-national innovation systemscomplementarity and economic growth”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 191-211es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGodin, B. y Doré C. “Measuring the Impacts of Science: Beyond the Economic Dimension”. 2003es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGranger C. W. J. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”. Econometrica 37, no. 2 (1969): 424-438.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Z., Nordhaus W. y Scherer F. M. “Patents: Recent Trends and Puzzles”. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1989 (1989): 291-330es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Zvi. “Introduction”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 1-20.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Zvi. “Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”. Journal of Economic Literature 28, no. 4 (1990), 1661-1707es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Zvi. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Editor. A NBER Conference Report. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarris, R.I.D. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modeling. Prentice Hall, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHicks, Esther. Flows of Scientific Information: S/N, S/S, N/S Working Paper. Faculty of Management and Organization, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKatz, Sylvan. “Scale-Independent Indicators and Research Evaluation”. Paper No. 41, SPRU, University of Sussex, forthcoming Science and Public Policy, Brighton, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationlpatrick, Henry. “Some Useful Methods for Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 5, Washington, 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKingsley, G. “The Use of Case Studies in R&D Impact Evaluations”. En Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. B. Bozeman y J. Melkers, editores. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLangford, Cooper. “Measuring the Impact of University Research on Innovation”. Science, Technology, and Society Program. Faculty of General Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLink, Albert. “Economic Impact Assessments: Guidelines for conducting and interpreting assessment studies”. 1996.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E., Dalum, B. “National systems of production, innovation and competence building”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 213- 231.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMalerba, Franco. “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 247-264.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMansfield E. (1998), ‘Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: an Update of Empirical Findings’, Research Policy, 26, pp. 773-776.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerewitz, L. y Sosnick S. H. “The Budget´s New Clothes”. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co, 1971.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMullin, J., Adam, R., Halliwell, J., Milligen, L. “Science, Technology, and Innovation in Chile”. Pub licado por IDRC, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNelson, R., y Nelson K. “Technology, institutions, and innovation systems”. Research Policy, no.31 (2002): 265-272.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNiosi, Jorge. “National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective). Why some are slow learners”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 291-302.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOCDE. “The evaluation of scientific research: selected experiences”. París, 1997.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOhmae, K.. “The Borderless World. Harper”. New York, 1990.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, A. y Griliches, Z. “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 21-54.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, A. y Schankerman, M. “The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Rsearch Resources”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 55-72.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, A. y Schankerman, M.. “An Exploration into the Determinants of Research Intensity”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 209-232.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, Ariel. “Patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return”. NBER Working Paper no. 786, Cambridge, Mass: NBER, 1981.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPavitt, Keith. “Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson & Winter: a mixed record”. Paper No. 83, Electronic Working Paper Series, SPRU, Brighton, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPopper, S. W. “Economic Approaches to Measuring the Performance and Benefits of Fundamental Science”. Rand Domestic Research Division Report, Santa Monica, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRapini, M. S. “Uma investigação sobre a relação de Granger-causalidade entre ciência e tecnologia para países em catching up e para o Brasil”. Monografia de Graduação. Belo Horizonte: FACE-UFMG, 2000es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRyan, James. “Synthesis Report of Workshop on Assessing the Impact of PolicyOriented Social Science Research in Scheveningen, the Netherlands November 12-13, 2002”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 15, Washington, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSalter, A. y Martin, B. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review”. Working Paper # 34, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Brighton, UK, 1999.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSander, Cerstin. “Development research impact: reach”. Artículo para la presentación en el ICRAF International Workshop on Assessing Impacts in Natural Resource Management Research, Nairobi, 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSanz Menéndez, Luis. “Indicadores Relacionales y Redes Sociales en el Estudio de los Efectos de las Políticas de Ciencia y Tecnología”. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Unidad de Políticas Comparadas, SPRITTE, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSarafoglou, N. y Haynes K. E. “University Productivity in Sweden: A Demonstration and Explanatory Analysis for Economics and Business Programs”. The Annals of Regional Science 30, (1996): 285-304.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchankerman M. y Pakes, A. “Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period”. The Economic Journal 96, no. 384 (1986), 1052- 1076.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchmookler, Jacob. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSmith, Vincent. “Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 2, Washington, 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSwann, Meter. “Funding Basic Research: When is public finance preferable to attainable club good solutions?”. Final draft forthcoming in Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. A. Geuna, A. Salter y W.E. Steinmueller, editors, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationToole, Andrew. “The Impact of Public Basic Research on Industrial Innovation: Evidence from de Pharmaceutical Industry”. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 00-07, Stanford, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVelho, L. “The author and the beholder: how paradigm commitments can influence the interpretation of research results. Scientometrics 11, (1987): 59-70.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationViotti, E.B. “Pasive and Active National Learning Systems”. PhD. Dissertation. New School for Social Research, 1997.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYin, R. K. “Case Study Research: Design and Methods”. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989.es_CO
dc.subjectInvestigación -- Aspectos socialeses_CO
dc.subjectImpacto científicoes_CO
dc.subjectImpacto tecnológicoes_CO
dc.subjectImpacto científico -- Fuenteses_CO
dc.subject.otherImpactes_CO
dc.subject.otherScience indicatorses_CO
dc.subject.otherResearch -- Social aspectses_CO
dc.titleRecuento crítico de la literatura sobre los impactos de la investigación y sus indicadoreses_CO
dc.typeDocumento de Trabajoes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperes_CO
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1181-13CTS p1c3 recuento crítico literatura.pdf
Size:
77.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Recuento crítico literatura
Download

Collections

Estudios de Impacto