Publication:
La evaluación de programas de investigación y su impacto en la sociedad colombiana

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorVillaveces, José Luis
dc.contributor.advisorJaramillo Salazar, Hernán
dc.contributor.advisorUniversidad del Rosario
dc.contributor.advisorHerrera Herrera, Bernardo
dc.contributor.advisorUniversidad de los Andes
dc.contributor.authorForero Pineda, Clemente
dc.contributor.authorBotina, María Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorBucheli Gerrero, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorCharum Diaz, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorDaza, Sandra Patricia
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Rey, Abelardo
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, César Orlando
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Sepúlveda, Bibiana
dc.contributor.authorLlanos Ballestas, Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorMurcia Linares, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorOlaya, Doris Lucía
dc.contributor.authorOrozco, Luis Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRiaga Gerrero, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Gutiérrez, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Adriana Eleonora
dc.contributor.authorUsgame Zubiela, Diana
dc.contributor.authorValderrama Pineda, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorVelasco Campuzano, María
dc.contributor.authorVilla, Federico
dc.contributor.authorViviescas Ramírez, Federico
dc.contributor.authorZambrano, Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-20T02:54:02Z
dc.date.available2016-05-20T02:54:02Z
dc.date.created2002
dc.descriptionEl objetivo de este estudio se centra en evaluar la inversión en investigación científica y tecnológica realizada a través de los programas del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (SNCyT). En particular, se analiza el papel de las políticas publicadas de CyT, partiendo de la base que éstas políticas en la década de los noventa en Colombia se organizaron por la definición de "programas de investigación", lo que hace posible adoptar una perspectiva de análisis de sus efectos. La noción del "programa de investigación" vuelve homogéneos los espacios de la ciencia y la tecnología permitiendo así superar las diferencias de evaluación de una y otra. Se concentra en tres ámbitos: producción, políticas públicas y cultura.es_CO
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, COLCIENCIASes_CO
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_CO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/569
dc.language.isospaes_CO
dc.publisher.editorDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, COLCIENCIASes_CO
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccesses_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbramovitz, M.A, David P.A. “Convergence and deferred catch-up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism”. CEPR Publication No 401. Stanford University, Stanford, 1994.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAdamo, Abra “Strategic Evaluation of Policy Influence: What Evaluation Reports Tell Us About Public Policy Influence” IDRC-Supported Research for the Evaluation Unit, Abril 30 de 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAgapitova, Holm-Nielsen y Vukmirovic. “Science and Technology in Colombia: Status and Perspectives”. Human Development Department LCSHD Paper Series No. 73, The World Bank, Latin American and the Caribbean Regional Office, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAghion, P y Howitt, P. Endogeneus Growth Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. Arora, A. y Gambardella, A. “The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research in Economics”. 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBania, N., Calkins L. y Dalenberg D. “The Effects of Regional Science and Technology Policy on the Geographic Distribution of Industrial R&D Laboratories”. Journal of Regional Science, vol. 32, no. 2 (1992): 209-228.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBanze, C. E. “A especificidade e a diversidade do continente africano: uma sugestão inicial de tipologias de sistemas nacionais de inovação”. Monografia de Graduação, Belo Horizonte, FACE-UFMG, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBeggs, J. “Long-Run Trends in Patenting”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 155-174.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBernard, Anne. “IDRC Networks: An Ethnographic Perspective”. International Development Research Centre, 1996.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBernardes, A. y Albuquerque, E. “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries”. Research Policy 32 (2003): 865-885.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBlair, Cameron. “Evaluating research and development performance”. Mem Desk Research, 1999.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBloch, Erich (chairman). “Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Biological Sciences”. Report of a Workshop, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBronson Associates. “A Managers’s Guide for Assessing the Impact of Science and Policy Development”. Canadá, 1999.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrown, Martin. “Cost/benefit analysis of large scale S&T projects: notes on some methodological issues”. Trabajo para Megascience: The OECD Forum, París, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCalvert, J., y Martin, B. “Changing conceptions of basic research”. Documento para el Workshop on Policy Relevance and Measurement of Basic Research, Oslo, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallon M. “ Redes tecno-economicas e irrevesibilidad”, Redes, Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, Buenos Aires, Universidad de Quilmes. 1991.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallon M., 1994, “Four Models for the Dynamics of Sciences”, in Jasanoff S., markle G.E., Petersen J.-C, and Pinch T. (eds), Handbook of Sciences and Technology Studies, London, Sage.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallon M., 1999, “Le réseau comme forme emergente et comme modalité de coordination: le cas des interactions stratégiques entre firmes industrielles et laboratoires académiques”, in Callon M, Cohendet P, Curien N, Dalle J.M,Eymard-Duvernay F, Foray D, y Schhenk E., Réseau et coordination, Economica.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallon, Michel. “Le réseau comme forme émergente et comme modalité de coordination: le cas des interactions stratégiques entre firmes industrielles et laboratoires académiques”. En Réseau et Coordination. Michel Callon, Cohendet, Curien, Dalle Eymard-Duvernay, Foray & Schenk. Paris: Economica, 1999. 13-64.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCapron, H., y Cincera M. “Assessing the institutional set up of national innovation systems”. Universidad Libre de Bruselas, Bruselas.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCapron, Henri y Van Pottelsberghe, Bruno “Public Support to R&D Programmes: an Integrated Assessment Scheme” Unité d’Economie Spatiale et de la Technologie, Capitulo 4, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCárdenas J.H. (ed). “Doctorados, Reflexiones para la formulación de políticas en América Latina” Tercer Mundo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 1991es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M. y Rickne, A. “Innovation systems. Analytical and methodological issues”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 233-245.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCassiman, B. Perez-Castrillo, D. y Veugelers, R. “Endogeneizing know-how flows trough the nature R&D investment”. Paper presented 1er World Congress of the Game Theory Society, Bilbao and the EARIC, Conference Lausanne, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCastro S. (ed), 2000, La reestructuración de las ciencias sociales en América Latina, Bogotá, CEJA.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClarke, George “How the Quality of Institutions Affects Technological Deepening in Developing Countries” The World Bank gclarke@worldbank.org, Development Research Group.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationColciencias, 1993, Los retos de la diversidad. Bases para un plan nacional del programa nacional de ciencias sociales y humanas, Santafé de Bogotá, Colciencias.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationColombia. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 1991, La Revolución Pacífica. Plan de Desarrollo Económico y Social Cambio para Construir la Paz 1998-2002 : Bases, Santafé de Bogotá : DNP, xv, 483 P.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationColombia. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 1998, Cambio para Construir la Paz 1998-2002 : Bases, Bogotá: DNP.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollins, Harry. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCoriat, B., y Weinstein, O. “Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 273-290.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCozzens, S. E. “Assessment of Fundamental Science programs in the Context of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)”. Rand Domestic Research Division Report. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCharnes, A., Cooper W. W. y Ferguson R. “Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming”. Management Science 1, (1955): 138-151.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCharum J., Parrado S., 1997, Entre el productor y el usuario. La utilidad de la investigación universitaria, Bogotá, ICFES-Universidad Nacional.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDa Motta e Albuquerque y Tristao Bernardes. “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: a tentative simplified model and initial notes about statistics from 120 countries”. Texto para discussion No. 157, Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais, Faculdade De Ciências Económicas, Centro De Desenvolvimento E Planejamento Regional, Belo Horizonte, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDavid, P., y Keely, L. “The economics of scientific research coalitions: collaborative network formation in the presence of multiple funding agencies”. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 01-24, Stanford, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDepartamento Nacional de Planeación. “Decreto 393 de 1991”. Bogotá, 2001. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. “Decreto Número 585 de 1991”. Bogotá, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDickey, D.A. y Fuller W. A. “Likelihood Ratio Satatistics for Autorregresive Time Series with a Unit Root”. Econometrica 49, issue 4 (1981): 1057-1072.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDixit, Avinash. “Some Lessons from Transaction-Cost Politics for Less-Developed Countries”. Working paper, Princeton University, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDixit, Avinash. The Making of a Economic Policy: A Transaction Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEasterly W., 2003, En busca del crecimiento. Andanzas y tribulaciones de los economistas del desarrollo, Antoni Bosch.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEconomides, Nicholas. “The Economics of Networks”. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14, no. 2 (1996).es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEcheverri L., Mesa G., 2002, Ciencias Sociales en Colombia 1991, COLCIENCIAS.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEnglander, A.S, Evenson, R. y Hanazaki, M. “R&D, Innovation and the Total factor Productivity Slowdown”. OECD Econ. Stu. 11, (1988): 8-42.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRepresentation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica 55, no. 2 (1987): 251-276. Etxeberría E., 1995, Análisis de Datos y Textos, Madrid, RA-MA. Evenson, R. “International Invention: Implications for Technology Marketes_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAnalysis”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 73-88.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEverell, Marc. “Manager’s Guide to S&T Impact Assessment”. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, 1997.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationForero, Clemente. “Database Protection and Scientific Information in Developing Countries”. Symposium on Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science, París, 2003.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFrechtling Westat, Joy. The 2002 User Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. NSF, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFreeman, Chris. “Continental, national and sub- national innovation systemscomplementarity and economic growth”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 191-211.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGodin, B y Doré C. “Les indicateurs d’impacts de la recherche”. Reporte presentado a la CREPUQ, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGodin, B. y Doré C. “Measuring the Impacts of Science: Beyond the Economic Dimension”. 2003.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGodin, Benoît. “Are statistics really useful? Myths and Politics of Science and Technology Indicators”. Project of the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Working Paper No. 20, Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, Montreal, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGranger C. W. J. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”. Econometrica 37, no. 2 (1969): 424-438.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Z., Nordhaus W. y Scherer F. M. “Patents: Recent Trends and Puzzles”. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics 1989 (1989): 291-330.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Zvi. “Introduction”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 1-20.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Zvi. “Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”. Journal of Economic Literature 28, no. 4 (1990), 1661-1707.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGriliches, Zvi. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Editor. A NBER Conference Report. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGutierrez F, Martínez G., 1993, “La comunidad de Ciencias sociales. Una visión desde Colciencias”, Colombia Ciencia y Tecnología, vol. 10, 4, pp. 4-6.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHansson, Finn “How to Evaluate and Select New Scientific Knowledge by Introducing the Social Dimension in the Evaluation of Research Quality”, Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School, fh.lpf@cbs.dk, Octubre 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarris, R.I.D. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modeling. Prentice Hall, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHerrenalb Bad. “Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation”. Proceedings from the US-EU Workshop on Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation. Shapira P. y Kuhlmann S, editors, Alemania, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHicks, Esther. Flows of Scientific Information: S/N, S/S, N/S Working Paper. Faculty of Management and Organization, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHodgson, Geoffrey. Economics and Institutions. London: Polity Press, 1988. Holbrook, J. “The Use of National Systems of Innovation Models to Develop Indicators of Innovation and Technological Capacity”. CPROST Report # 97-06.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoyos G., 1993, “Un Año de Promoción de las Ciencias Humanas y Sociales”, Colombia Ciencia y Tecnología, vol. 10, 4, pp. 17-19.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationImpact Assessment and Evaluation Group (IAEG) of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) “Impact Assessment of Agricultural Research: Context and State of the Art” for the ASARECA / ECART / CTA Workshop on Impact Assessment of Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (Uganda, November 1999), Abril 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJaramillo, H., Lugonés, G. Y Salazar M. Manual de Bogotá. Bogotá: Tres Culturas Editores Ltda., 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKammer, Raymond “IRI Symposium on Changing Paradigms in Science and Technology Policy” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Marzo 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKatz, Sylvan. “Scale-Independent Indicators and Research Evaluation”. Paper No. 41, SPRU, University of Sussex, forthcoming Science and Public Policy, Brighton, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKilpatrick, Henry “Some Useful Methods for Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research” International Food Policy Research Ins titute, ifpri@cgiar.org , Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 5, Octubre 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKingsley, G. “The Use of Case Studies in R&D Impact Evaluations”. En Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. B. Bozeman y J. Melkers, editores. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKostoff, Ronald. The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment. 7a Edición. DTIC Report Number ADA296021. Office of Naval Research, 1997.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLangford, Cooper. “Measuring the Impact of University Research on Innovation”. Science, Technology, and Society Program. Faculty of General Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeibenstein, Harvey. “Property Rights and X-efficiency: Comment”. American Economic Review 73, no. 4 (1983): 831-842.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeysdesdorff L., 1991, “In Search of Epistemic Networks ”, Social Studies of science, vol. 21, pp. 75-110.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLink, Albert. “Economic Impact Assessments: Guidelines for conducting and interpreting assessment studies”. 1996.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E., Dalum, B. “National systems of production, innovation and competence building”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 213- 231.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLusthaus C., Anderson G. y Murphy E. Institutional Assessment: A Framework for Strengthening Organizational Capacity for IDRC’s Research Partners. IDRC, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMalerba, Franco. “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 247-264.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMansfield E. (1998), ‘Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: an Update of Empirical Findings’, Research Policy, 26, pp. 773-776.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMenéndez, Luis. “Indicadores Relacionales y Redes Sociales en el Estudio de los Efectos de las Políticas de Ciencia y Tecnología”. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Unidad de Políticas Comparadas, SPRITTE, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerewitz, L. y Sosnick S. H. “The Budget´s New Clothes”. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co, 1971.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMetcalfe, J. “Science Policy and Technology Policy in a Competitive Economy”. International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 24, no. 7/8/9 (1997), 727-740.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 1. Colombia: al filo de la oportunidad. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República-Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 2. Educación para el desarrollo. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República- Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 3. Investigación y educación para el desarrollo. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República-Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 4. Ciencia y educación para el desarrollo. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República-Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 5. Creatividad, formación e investigación. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República-Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 6. Derecho, etnias y ecología. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República- Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMisión de Ciencia, Educación y Desarrollo. Colección Documentos de la Misión. Vol. 7. Educación, ciencia e instituciones. Santafé de Bogotá: Presidencia de la República- Consejería Presidencial para el Desarrollo Institucional-COLCIENCIAS, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoser, Susanne “Impact assessments and decision-making: How can we connect the two?” Belfer Center for Science & International Affairs, Harvard University, Agosto 1999.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMullin, James. “El cambio de modelos en la financiación de la investigación”. Nelson, R., y Nelson K. “Technology, institutions, and innovation systems”. Research Policy, no.31 (2002): 265-272.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNiosi, Jorge. “National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective). Why some are slow learners”. Research Policy, no. 31 (2002): 291-302.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOhmae, K.. “The Borderless World. Harper”. New York, 1990.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, A. y Griliches, Z. “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 21-54.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, A. y Schankerman, M. “The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Rsearch Resources”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 55-72.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, A. y Schankerman, M.. “An Exploration into the Determinants of Research Intensity”. En R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Zvi Griliches, editor. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. 209-232.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPakes, Ariel. “Patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return”. NBER Working Paper no. 786, Cambridge, Mass: NBER, 1981.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPavitt, Keith. “Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson & Winter: a mixed record”. Paper No. 83, Electronic Working Paper Series, SPRU, Brighton, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPolanco, Xavier. “Experiencia del INIST en la producción de indicadores infométricos. Indicadores y vigilancia científica y tecnológica”. Ponencia Taller Andino de Indicadores de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Bogotá, 2001es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPopper, S. W. “Economic Approaches to Measuring the Performance and Benefits of Fundamental Science”. Rand Domestic Research Division Report, Santa Monica, 1995.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPorter A., Roessner, D., Jin Xiao-Yin y Newman N. “Changes in National Technological Competitiveness: 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999”. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 13, no. 4 (2001): 477-496.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPorter, M., Emmons W., Brenes E., Montenegro S., Madrigal K., Niño, L., y Gisbert R. “Institutions for Competitiveness in Colombia: Summary Report”. Andean Competitiveness Project Working Paper, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRamlogan, R. y Metcalfe J. “Limits to the Economy of Knowledge and Knowledge of the Economy”. ESCR Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRamos E., 1999, La investigación en ciencias sociales: difusión y uso de sus resultados, Informe de consultoría, mimeo,Bogotá, Colciencias.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRapini, M. S. “Uma investigação sobre a relação de Granger-causalidade entre ciência e tecnologia para países em catching up e para o Brasil”. Monografia de Graduação. Belo Horizonte: FACE-UFMG, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReal Academia Española. Diccionario de la Lengua Española. 22a edición. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRICYT. “Estado de la Ciencia. Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos / Interamericanos”. Disponible en www.ricyt.org. 2001es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRip A., 1986, “Between dirigism and laissez- faire: Effects of implementing the science policy priority for biotechnology in the Netherlands”, Research Policy, vol. 15, pp. 253-268.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRip A., 2000, Societal Challenges for R&D Evaluation, Proceeding for the 2000 U.S.- European Workshop on Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, Bad Herrenalb, Germany. Available in: http://www.cherry.iac.gatech.edu/e-value/bhproceed/ 00-Front.pdfes_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRip, A., Nederhof A. “Between Dirigism and Laissez-Faire: Effects of Implementing the Science Policy Priority for Biotechnology in the Netherlands”. Research Policy, no 15 (1986): 253-268.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRyan, James. “Synthesis Report of Workshop on Assessing the Impact of Policy- Oriented Social Science Research in Scheveningen, the Netherlands November 12-13, 2002”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 15, Washington, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSalter, A. y Martin, B. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review”. Working Paper # 34, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Brighton, UK, 1999.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSander, Cerstin. “Development research impact: reach”. Artículo para la presentación en el ICRAF International Workshop on Assessing Impacts in Natural Resource Management Research, Nairobi, 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSanz Menéndez, Luis. “Indicadores Relacionales y Redes Sociales en el Estudio de los Efectos de las Políticas de Ciencia y Tecnología”. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Unidad de Políticas Comparadas, SPRITTE, 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSarafoglou, N. y Haynes K. E. “University Productivity in Sweden: A Demonstration and Explanatory Analysis for Economics and Business Programs”. The Annals of Regional Science 30, (1996): 285-304.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScott, Alister “The Dissemination of Environmental Research”, Science and Technology Policy Research, www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/, a.h.scott@sussex.ac.uk Octubre 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScott, Alister “The Power Of Ideas: Effective Research For Environmental Decision-Making” Science and Technology Policy Research, www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/, Electronic working Paper Series, PAPER NO. 63, Febrero 2001.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchankerman M. y Pakes, A. “Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period”. The Economic Journal 96, no. 384 (1986), 1052- 1076.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchmookler, Jacob. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSmith, Vincent “Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research” International Food Policy Research Institute, ifpri@cgnet.com, Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No.2, Julio 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSmith, Vincent. “Measuring the Benefits of Social Science Research”. Impact Assessment Discussion Paper No. 2, Washington, 1998.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSwann, Meter. “Funding Basic Research: When is public finance preferable to attainable club good solutions?”. Final draft forthcoming in Science and Innovation:Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. A. Geuna, A. Salter y W.E. Steinmueller, editors, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTassey, Gregory “R&D Performance Measures for Government Research” National Institute of Standards and Technology.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationToole, Andrew. “The Impact of Public Basic Research on Industrial Innovation: Evidence from de Pharmaceutical Industry”. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 00-07, Stanford, 2000.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTrewin, Dennis. “Measuring a Knowledge-Base Economy and Society”. Discussion Paper, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUNESCO. “Science & Technology Statistics and Indicators in Developing Countries: Perspectives and Challenges”. Working Document for the Expert Meeting, Montreal, 2002.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVelho, L. “The author and the beholder: how paradigm commitments can influence the interpretation of research results. Scientometrics 11, (1987): 59-70.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVessuri, H. y Canino, M. V. “Latin American Catalysis: as seen through the Ibero- American Catalysis Symposia”. Science, Technology and Society 7, no. 2 (2002): 339-363.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVessuri, Hebe. “Aprendizaje Científico Técnico y Cambio Cultural en Venezuela: un enfoque microsociológico”. Redes IV, no. 9 (1997): 49-77es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationViotti, E.B. “Pasive and Active National Learning Systems”. PhD. Dissertation. New School for Social Research, 1997.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYin, R. K. “Case Study Research: Design and Methods”. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989.es_CO
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZucker, Lynne G. “Institutional Theories of Organization”. Annual Reviews of Sociology, no. 13 (1987): 443-464.es_CO
dc.subjectProgreso tecnologicoes_CO
dc.subjectPolitica cientifica y tecnologicaes_CO
dc.subjectPolitica gubernamental de innovaciones_CO
dc.subjectProgreso científicoes_CO
dc.subjectColombia. Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Scientyes_CO
dc.subject.otherScience and Technology Policyes_CO
dc.subject.otherGovernment innovation policyes_CO
dc.subject.otherTechnological progresses_CO
dc.titleLa evaluación de programas de investigación y su impacto en la sociedad colombianaes_CO
dc.title.alternativeSerie de estudios y evaluaciones de ciencia, tecnología e innovación N° 12002es_CO
dc.typeDocumento de Trabajoes_CO
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperes_CO
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections

Estudios y Evaluaciones de CTel